Patent & IP news archive

Medinol, Ltd.
v. Cordis Corporation et. al.

Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01408-SAS, the Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin presiding.
Filed on March 1, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York;

Plaintiffs

v.
Medinol
Kenyon & Kenyon;
Mark Alexander Chapman
Richard Louis DeLucia
Elizabeth A. Gardner
Aloysius Antony Pfeffer

Patents in case

  • 5,980,552: “Articulated stent” by Pinchasik et. al. Prosecuted by Kenyon & Kenyon. Includes 14 claims (4 indep.). Was application 08/760,359. Granted 11/9/1999.
  • 6,589,276: “Articulated stent” by Pinchasik et. al. Prosecuted by Kenyon & Kenyon. Includes 16 claims (3 indep.). Was application 10/292,759. Granted 7/8/2003.
  • 6,059,811: “Articulated stent” by Pinchasik et. al. Prosecuted by Kenyon & Kenyon. Includes 20 claims (5 indep.). Was application 09/026,750. Granted 5/9/2000.
  • 5,449,373: “Articulated stent” by Pinchasik et. al. Prosecuted by Skjerven, Morrill, MacPherson, Franklin & Friel. Includes 6 claims (1 indep.). Was application 08/213,272. Granted 9/12/1995.
  • 6,875,228: “Articulated stent” by Pinchasik et. al. Prosecuted by Morgan & Finnegan, L.L.P.. Includes 22 claims (3 indep.). Was application 10/442,171. Granted 4/5/2005.

Attorney? Our daily litigation alerts are free, awesome, and include complaint PDFs.

Case documents (PDF)

Fig. 1 from 6,875,228

6,875,228 figure 1

Litigant weblinks

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of service
Privacy policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.