Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 8:12-cv-02206-CJC-JPR, the Hon. Cormac J. Carney presiding.
Filed on Dec. 21, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California;

Patents in case

• 6,745,060: “Signal processing apparatus” by Diab et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP. Includes 35 claims (10 indep.). Was application 10/006,427. Granted 6/1/2004.
• 7,489,958: “Signal processing apparatus and method” by Diab et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP. Includes 65 claims (4 indep.). Was application 11/417,858. Granted 2/10/2009.
• 6,580,086: “Shielded optical probe and method” by Schulz et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP. Includes 36 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/420,544. Granted 6/17/2003.
• 6,002,952: “Signal processing apparatus and method” by Diab et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens Olson & Bear, LLP. Includes 16 claims (4 indep.). Was application 08/834,194. Granted 12/14/1999.
• 7,215,986: “Signal processing apparatus” by Diab et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP. Includes 41 claims (10 indep.). Was application 11/154,093. Granted 5/8/2007.
• 7,509,154: “Signal processing apparatus” by Diab et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens Olson & Bear, LLP. Includes 16 claims (2 indep.). Was application 11/842,117. Granted 3/24/2009.
• 6,699,194: “Signal processing apparatus and method” by Diab et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP. Includes 22 claims (12 indep.). Was application 09/547,588. Granted 3/2/2004.
• 6,263,222: “Signal processing apparatus” by Diab et. al. Prosecuted by Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP. Includes 23 claims (6 indep.). Was application 08/943,511. Granted 7/17/2001.