Patent & IP news archive

LifeScreen Sciences LLC
v. Cordis Corporation

Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-00091; no judge yet assigned.
Filed on Jan. 23, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas;

Plaintiffs

v.
LifeScreen Sciences
Friedman Suder & Cooke; Fort Worth, TX
Decker A. Cammack
Brett M. Pinkus
Jonathan T. Suder

Defendants

Patents in case

  • 5,709,704: “Blood clot filtering” by Nott et. al. Prosecuted by Fish & Richardson P.C.. Includes 32 claims (3 indep.). Was application 08/346,733. Granted 1/20/1998.
  • 6,214,025: “Self-centering, self-expanding and retrievable vena cava filter” by Thistle et. al. Prosecuted by Hoffman & Baron, LLP. Includes 43 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/427,917. Granted 4/10/2001.

Attorney? Our daily litigation alerts are free, awesome, and include complaint PDFs.

Case documents (PDF)

Fig. 1 from 6,214,025

6,214,025 figure 1

Litigant weblinks

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of service
Privacy policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.