Patent & IP news archive

Life Technologies Corporation et. al.
v. Promega Corporation

Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-02992-WQH-MDD, the Hon. William Q. Hayes presiding.
Filed on Dec. 17, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California;

Plaintiffs

v.
Applied Biosystems
Weil Gotshal and Manges LLP; Redwood City, CA
Edward R. Reines

Defendants

Patents in case

  • 6,221,598: “Multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat loci” by Schumm et. al. Prosecuted by Michael Best & Friedrich LLP Frenchick; Grady J. King; Karen B.. Includes 43 claims (8 indep.). Was application 09/327,229. Granted 4/24/2001.
  • 5,843,660: “Multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat loci” by Schumm et. al. Prosecuted by Frenchick; Grady J. Stroud, Stroud, Willink, Thompson & Howard King; Karen B.. Includes 43 claims (4 indep.). Was application 08/632,575. Granted 12/1/1998.
  • 7,008,771: “Multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat loci” by Schumm et. al. Prosecuted by Michael Best & Friedrich Frenchick; Grady J.. Includes 6 claims (3 indep.). Was application 10/236,577. Granted 3/7/2006.
  • 6,479,235: “Multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat loci” by Schumm et. al. Prosecuted by Michael Best & Friedrich LLP Frenchick; Grady J. King; Karen B.. Includes 24 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/199,542. Granted 11/12/2002.

Attorney? Our daily litigation alerts are free, awesome, and include complaint PDFs.

Case documents (PDF)

Litigant weblinks

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of service
Privacy policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.