Patent & IP news archive

Liberty Sport, Inc. et. al.
v. Miro Optix LLC

Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00141-KSH-PS, the Hon. Katharine S. Hayden presiding.
Filed on Jan. 8, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey;

Plaintiffs

v.
Halo Sports And Safety
Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik Llp; Westfield, NJ
Robert B. Hander

Defendants

Patents in case

  • 7,137,700: “Impact resistant eyewear frame assembly having a split frame and fastener reinforcement” by DiChiara et. al. Prosecuted by Roylance, Abrams, Berdo & Goodman, L.L.P.. Includes 33 claims (3 indep.). Was application 11/124,373. Granted 11/21/2006.
  • 6,890,073: “Impact resistant eyewear frame assembly having a split frame” by DiChiara et. al. Prosecuted by Roylance, Abrams, Berdo, & Goodman, L.L.P.. Includes 24 claims (3 indep.). Was application 10/391,796. Granted 5/10/2005.

Attorney? Our daily litigation alerts are free, awesome, and include complaint PDFs.

Case documents (PDF)

Litigant weblinks

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of service
Privacy policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.