Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-01258-UNA; no judge yet assigned.
Filed on Dec. 19, 2011 in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware;
Plaintiffs
v.
Juniper Networks
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP;
Wilmington,
DE
Jack B. Blumenfeld
Jennifer Ying
Defendants
Palo Alto Networks
Patents in case
-
7,302,700:
“Method and apparatus for implementing a layer 3/layer 7 firewall in an L2 device”
by Mao et. al. and assigned to
Juniper Networks, Inc..
Prosecuted by
Harrity Snyder, LLP.
Includes 24 claims (8 indep.).
Was application 09/967,878.
Filed 9/28/2001 &
Granted 11/27/2007.
-
6,772,347:
“Method, apparatus and computer program product for a network firewall”
by Xie et. al. and assigned to
Juniper Networks, Inc..
Prosecuted by
Fish & Richardson P.C..
Includes 24 claims (6 indep.).
Was application 09/525,369.
Filed 3/15/2000 &
Granted 8/3/2004.
-
7,650,634:
“Intelligent integrated network security device”
by Zuk and assigned to
Juniper Networks, Inc..
Prosecuted by
Harrity & Harrity, LLP.
Includes 41 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 10/402,920.
Filed 3/28/2003 &
Granted 1/19/2010.
-
7,093,280:
“Internet security system”
by Ke et. al. and assigned to
Juniper Networks, Inc..
Prosecuted by
Harrity Snyder, LLP.
Includes 40 claims (5 indep.).
Was application 09/967,893.
Filed 9/27/2001 &
Granted 8/15/2006.
-
8,077,723:
“Packet processing in a multiple processor system”
by Zuk et. al. and assigned to
Juniper Networks, Inc..
Prosecuted by
Harrity & Harrity, LLP.
Includes 20 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 12/780,695.
Filed 5/14/2010 &
Granted 12/13/2011.
-
7,779,459:
“Method and apparatus for implementing a layer 3/layer 7 firewall in an L2 device”
by Mao et. al. and assigned to
Juniper Networks, Inc..
Prosecuted by
Harrity & Harrity, LLP.
Includes 23 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 11/869,287.
Filed 10/9/2007 &
Granted 8/17/2010.
- Complaint ($1.97)
- 7,302,700
- 6,772,347
- 7,650,634
- 7,093,280
- 8,077,723
- 7,779,459