Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 5:12-cv-05827-HRL, the Hon.
Howard R. Lloyd presiding.
Filed on Nov. 14, 2012 in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California;
Plaintiffs
v.
Good Technology
McKook Smith, P.C.;
Dallas,
TX
Steven Callahan
Cypress, LLP;
Mexico City,
DIF
Robert James Muller
Douglas Patrick Roy
McKool Smith;
Redwood City,
CA
Courtland Lewis Reichman
Geoffrey L. Smith
Unknown Firm;
Austin,
TX
Steven John Pollinger
Good Technology Software
Patents in case
-
6,151,606:
“System and method for using a workspace data manager to access, manipulate and synchronize network.”
by Mendez and assigned to
Visto Corporation.
Prosecuted by
Graham & James LLP.
Includes 21 claims (4 indep.).
Was application 09/008,354.
Filed 1/16/1998 &
Granted 11/21/2000.
-
7,702,322:
“Method and system for distributing and updating software in wireless devices”
by Maurya et. al.
Prosecuted by
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP.
Includes 18 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 11/363,583.
Granted 4/20/2010.
-
7,970,386:
“System and method for monitoring and maintaining a wireless device”
by Bhat et. al.
Prosecuted by
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP.
Includes 24 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 11/145,391.
Granted 6/28/2011.
-
8,012,219:
“System and method for preventing access to data on a compromised remote device”
by Mendez et. al.
Prosecuted by
Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P..
Includes 31 claims (4 indep.).
Was application 10/637,267.
Granted 9/6/2011.