Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00894; no judge yet assigned.
Filed on Nov. 27, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas;

Patents in case

• 6,278,888: “Radiotelephones having contact-sensitive user interfaces and methods of operating same” by Hayes, Jr. et. al. Prosecuted by Myers Bigel Sibley & Sajovec. Includes 36 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/625,674. Granted 8/21/2001.
• 6,473,506: “Signaling using phase rotation techniques in a digital communications system” by Hook et. al. Prosecuted by Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, L.L.P.. Includes 32 claims (6 indep.). Was application 09/170,127. Granted 10/29/2002.
• 6,624,832: “Methods, apparatus and computer program products for providing user input to an application using a.” by Thomas. Prosecuted by Myers Bigel Sibley & Sajovec. Includes 13 claims (3 indep.). Was application 08/960,236. Granted 9/23/2003.
• 6,029,052: “Multiple-mode direct conversion receiver” by Isberg et. al. Prosecuted by Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, L.L.P.. Includes 18 claims (2 indep.). Was application 08/886,244. Granted 2/22/2000.
• 6,519,223: “System and method for implementing a semi reliable retransmission protocol” by Wager et. al. and assigned to Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (publ). Prosecuted by Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.. Includes 37 claims (6 indep.). Was application 09/287,392. Filed 4/6/1999 & Granted 2/11/2003.
• 6,301,556: “Reducing sparseness in coded speech signals” by Hagen et. al. Prosecuted by Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.. Includes 68 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/470,472. Granted 10/9/2001.
• 6,418,310: “Wireless subscriber terminal using java control code” by Dent. Prosecuted by Coats & Bennett, P.L.L.C.. Includes 20 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/368,663. Granted 7/9/2002.
• 6,445,917: “Mobile station measurements with event-based reporting” by Bark et. al. Prosecuted by Nixon & Vanderhye PC. Includes 74 claims (20 indep.). Was application 09/314,019. Granted 9/3/2002.
• 6,058,359: “Speech coding including soft adaptability feature” by Hagen et. al. Prosecuted by Jenkens & Gilchrist, P.C.. Includes 54 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/034,590. Granted 5/2/2000.
• 8,169,992: “Uplink scrambling during random access” by Parkvall et. al. Prosecuted by Nixon & Vanderhye P.C.. Includes 15 claims (4 indep.). Was application 11/835,782. Granted 5/1/2012.
• 6,772,215: “Method for minimizing feedback responses in ARQ protocols” by Rathonyi et. al. and assigned to Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ).. Includes 64 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/537,146. Filed 3/29/2000 & Granted 8/3/2004.