Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-01062-EJF, the Hon.
Evelyn J. Furse presiding.
Filed on Nov. 14, 2012 in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah;
Plaintiffs
v.
CAO Group
Maschoff Gilmore & Israelsen;
Park City,
UT
Mark W. Ford
Kirk R. Harris
Charles J. Veverka
Defendants
Kerr
Sybron Dental Specialities
Patents in case
-
6,719,559:
“Curing light”
by Cao.
Prosecuted by
McCarthy; Daniel P. Parsons Behle & Latimer.
Includes 20 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 10/076,128.
Granted 4/13/2004.
-
6,799,967:
“Light for use in activating light-activated materials, the light having a plurality of light emitting.”
by Cao.
Prosecuted by
McCarthy; Daniel P. Parsons Behle & Latimer.
Includes 60 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 10/188,520.
Granted 10/5/2004.
-
6,755,648:
“Curing light”
by Cao.
Prosecuted by
McCarthy; Daniel P. Parsons Behle & Latimer.
Includes 11 claims (7 indep.).
Was application 10/067,692.
Granted 6/29/2004.
-
6,783,362:
“Dental curing light using primary and secondary heat sink combination”
by Cao.
Prosecuted by
McCarthy; Daniel P. Parsons Behle & Latimer.
Includes 20 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 10/017,272.
Granted 8/31/2004.
-
6,955,537:
“LIGHT FOR USE IN ACTIVATING LIGHT-ACTIVATED MATERIALS, THE LIGHT HAVING A PLURALITY OF LIGHT EMITTING.”
by Cao.
Prosecuted by
McCarthy; Daniel P. Parsons Behle & Latimer.
Includes 21 claims (3 indep.).
Was application 10/189,255.
Granted 10/18/2005.
- Complaint ($1.97)
- 6,719,559
- 6,799,967
- 6,755,648
- 6,783,362
- 6,955,537