Patent & IP news archive

CA, Inc.
v. AppDynamics, Inc.

Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-02111-DRH-GRB, the Hon. Denis R. Hurley presiding.
Filed on April 10, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York;

Plaintiffs

v.
CA
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP; New York, NY
David John Ball

Defendants

Patents in case

  • 7,797,580: “Determining that a routine has stalled” by Cobb et. al. Prosecuted by Vierra Magen Marcus & DeNiro LLP. Includes 23 claims (6 indep.). Was application 11/167,333. Granted 9/14/2010.
  • 7,225,361: “Detecting a stalled routine” by Cobb et. al. Prosecuted by Vierra Magen Marcus & DeNiro, LLP. Includes 39 claims (15 indep.). Was application 10/079,966. Granted 5/29/2007.
  • 7,512,935: “Adding functionality to existing code at exits” by Cobb. Prosecuted by Vierra Magen Marcus & DeNiro LLP. Includes 71 claims (8 indep.). Was application 09/795,901. Granted 3/31/2009.

Attorney? Our daily litigation alerts are free, awesome, and include complaint PDFs.

Case documents (PDF)

Fig. 1 from 7,225,361

7,225,361 figure 1

Litigant weblinks

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of service
Privacy policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.