Patent & IP news archive

Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00787; no judge yet assigned.
Filed on Dec. 10, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas;

Plaintiffs

v.

Patents in case

  • 7,916,138: “Electro-optic vision systems” by John et. al. and assigned to GeoVector Corporation. Prosecuted by Ward & Olivo LLP. Includes 18 claims (3 indep.). Was application 11/945,000. Filed 11/26/2007 & Granted 3/29/2011.
  • 6,037,936: “Computer vision system with a graphic user interface and remote camera control” by Ellenby et. al. and assigned to Criticom Corp.. Prosecuted by Page Lohr. Includes 40 claims (4 indep.). Was application 08/662,219. Filed 6/12/1996 & Granted 3/14/2000.
  • 5,682,332: “Vision imaging devices and methods exploiting position and attitude” by Ellenby et. al. and assigned to Criticom Corporation. Prosecuted by Page Lohr Associates. Includes 5 claims (1 indep.). Was application 08/335,912. Filed 11/8/1994 & Granted 10/28/1997.
  • 7,301,536: “Electro-optic vision systems” by Ellenby et. al. and assigned to GeoVector Corporation. Prosecuted by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. Includes 7 claims (2 indep.). Was application 09/571,394. Filed 5/15/2000 & Granted 11/27/2007.
  • 6,031,545: “Vision system for viewing a sporting event” by Ellenby et. al. and assigned to Geovector Corporation. Prosecuted by Lohr; Page. Includes 10 claims (1 indep.). Was application 09/007,558. Filed 1/15/1998 & Granted 2/29/2000.

Attorney? Our daily litigation alerts are free, awesome, and include complaint PDFs.

Case documents (PDF)

Fig. 1 from 6,031,545

6,031,545 figure 1

Litigant weblinks

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.