Patent & IP news archive

AIP Acquisition LLC
v.

Complaint for Patent Infringement
Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01691-UNA; no judge yet assigned.
Filed on Dec. 11, 2012 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware;

Plaintiffs

v.
AIP Acquisition
Bayard, P.A.; Madison, WV
Stephen B. Brauerman
Richard D. Kirk

Defendants

Patents in case

  • 6,188,756: “Efficient communication through networks” by Mashinsky.. Includes 16 claims (10 indep.). Was application 08/727,681. Granted 2/13/2001.
  • 6,496,579: “Method of and system for efficient use of telecommunication networks” by Mashinsky. Prosecuted by Eng; Chi K.. Includes 10 claims (4 indep.). Was application 09/372,024. Granted 12/17/2002.
  • 7,724,879: “Efficient communication through networks” by Mashinsky and assigned to Anip, Inc.. Prosecuted by Cohen Pontani Lieberman & Pavane LLP. Includes 15 claims (1 indep.). Was application 11/895,460. Filed 8/24/2007 & Granted 5/25/2010.
  • 6,078,654: “Method of and system for efficient use of telecommunication networks” by Mashinsky. Prosecuted by Pennie & Edmonds LLP. Includes 10 claims (5 indep.). Was application 09/009,007. Granted 6/20/2000.

Attorney? Our daily litigation alerts are free, awesome, and include complaint PDFs.

Case documents (PDF)

Fig. 1 from 6,496,579

6,496,579 figure 1
Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of service
Privacy policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.